Sunday, April 11, 2021

Carol Howard Merritt's Healing Spiritual Wounds: A Review

Carol Howard Merritt’s book, Healing Spiritual Wounds: Reconnecting With a Loving God After Experiencing a Hurtful Church, begins with an explosive situation.

The book opens with a panic-stricken teenager, (the author), retreating into her room to escape an abusive father. As her father and mother are caught in their own brokenness, the teen begins to ask a series of questions, each ending with a haunting refrain.

“Fear choked me as I heard the voices of my mother and father, rising and cresting, with angry rhythms. I tried to figure out a strategy if it became dangerous… What should I do?”

Fortunately, God seems to meet her, at least temporarily, to calm her down. She simply breathed deeply, sat down on her bed and “an overwhelming sense that it would be okay – that I would be okay – flooded me. God surrounded me and embraced me.”

Merritt grew up in a Christian household, but the religion didn’t lend itself to answers, and, to a large extent, was a source of the problem. To begin to unravel unholy church experiences is complex, says Merritt. Especially for individuals who choose to hold onto their spirituality, no matter how wounded they have become.

“I wasn’t afraid to ask the questions or deal with the consequences if I eventually found religion unbearable,” she writes. “It’s just that when someone complains of religious wounds, we’re often told to quit going to church and disconnect from spiritual practices. No doubt this works for some people, but others see the world through an irremovable religious lens. Asking us to stop believing and practicing would be so unnatural that it would cause certain blindness.”

From this point, Merritt begins to deconstruct the fundamentalist, paternalistic brand of Christianity she grew up with, and, at the same time, offers meditative practices to foster healing.

“When students of humankind want to understand a culture, they take a careful look at its religions, myths, and artifacts. A society that worships a wrathful God will reflect violent characteristics and honor those traits in its people. They will begin to believe that God calls them to war rather than forgiveness.

“It’s not just an anthropological understanding, but it is also a neurological reality. Worshipping an angry God changes our cerebral chemistry. The amygdala, that primeval bit in the brain that triggers fear and anger gets a workout when we worship a God of fury, it becomes stronger, and we can begin to reflect that rage.”

By extension, Merritt argues that individual views of God can be reflected in society. A God of wrath creates guilt and shame. A God of love creates a society in which peace and love are valued.

To counteract these outcomes, Merritt introduces several examples of meditative exercises meant to help readers re-engage the church. One of the first meditative exercises that Merritt suggests is to realize that “Often God’s presence is understood through creation or actions, and the way to God is diverse… Can you recover your union with God through creation? Go on a walk, if you’re able. Look around, particularly at the elements that surround you, and finish these sentences:

God is like air, because…

God is like fire, because…

God is like the ground, because…

God is like water, because…”

The whole point is to latch on to what elements of creation “makes you most alive to God’s presence… then intentionally practice these things… [K]now that an important healing process is taking place as you learn to love God and be loved by God.”

A big part of emotional healing for Merritt is the realization that “there are core emotions such as anger, sadness and joy. And there are inhibitory emotions such as guilt, anxiety, and shame. When we experience core emotions, we also experience the release that follows. But the inhibitory emotions block a person from feeling core emotions and thus from feeling the release.

“Religion can be an especially powerful inhibiting force, because religious messages so effectively produce guilt and shame…

“[I]n order for us to have wholeness, we need to reclaim our emotional shards. You can start to do this by acknowledging your emotions.”

Merritt suggests that readers “take your emotional temperature, and check in with yourself throughout the day.” And then noticing patterns of behavior – “do you feel guilt surrounding certain emotions? Do you try to pretend some feelings don’t exist? Do you have a go-to emotion? Does gender factor into your emotional life?”

She offers an exercise to help accomplish this.

Later on in Healing Spiritual Wounds, she argues that how we view ourselves has ramifications on our world view. As Jesus taught, the ability to love ourselves is wrapped up in our ability to love others.

“How one views oneself is a common concern when people are longing for spiritual wholeness. It makes sense. Advertisements swarm us each day, reminding us of what we do not have… The average American is exposed to three hundred sixty ads every day… Every hour we are awake, we are told twenty-two times that we not rich, thin, young, beautiful, ripped, or stylish enough…

“Even though our culture has been criticized for being too narcissistic, being overly self-conscious can be a mask one learns to put on to hide damage and abuse. In the midst of all this, our religious understandings don’t always help…”

Merritt relates her own experience of attending a seminary that taught a fundamentalist doctrine. “Through the practice of evangelism, I realized I was hurting people with the premise of my evangelism. I thought we all deserved to go to hell.”

Carol Howard Merritt
As part of her seminary training, Merritt had to hit the streets of Chicago, witnessing to people. “I believed that God would send these beautiful people to eternal suffering unless they repeated the magic words [of the Salvation Prayer] after me. If I loved them, after fifteen minutes of noticing the curve of their cheeks and the angle of their nose, wouldn’t God love them more? Or was God’s wrath so violent that it caused some sort of divine blindness? If God created them, and blew breath into them, why would God care about that prayer, that random recipe for salvation? And what did I really believe about people if I thought that we all deserved eternal burning?”

Merritt makes an excellent point when she writes, “The denigrating images our religious traditions can inflict on people can move us to imagine ourselves as lowly creatures, undeserving of God’s love… Much of this belief system was designed to highlight the grace of God, but it is unnecessary to make a creature look bad in order for a Creator to look even better.”

Once again, Merritt offers a meditative practice to help clear the theological air.

She takes on Augustine, noting that he “moves the realm of sin from what we do to who we are. The sin is no longer an action, but a being, a woman. So he makes a distinct, damning move from guilt to shame when he judges not the action but the person.”

Merritt takes on proponents of the ‘prosperity gospel’ who preach a “faith as palpably demonstrated by wealth and places the individual over community. It’s message that ‘God wants to bless you with wealth….’ Disseminating the idea that money equals the good life, and that if you do what the Lord wants, then you will reap those blessings…

“The shadow side of these beliefs can heap shame on the poor and lead to the understanding that those who struggle deserve their lot in life…” So economic inequality fueled by social injustice gets ignored. On this point Merritt concludes: “As we keep hiding our hardships, individual responsibility turns into isolated suffering.”

About the subject of patriarchy in the church, Merritt defines it as “a system that promotes male privilege, or an unearned advantage that’s available to men while it’s denied to women…

“A patriarchal society has an obsession with control because patriarchy maintains its privilege through restraining women or men who might threaten it… In the religious arena, Christianity remains male-dominated, identified, and centered through our masculine ideas of God, by not allowing women to be in authority, and by building its theological systems based solely on the actions of men.”

Towards the end of Healing Spiritual Wounds, Merritt discusses the central idea of fundamentalism – individual salvation – versus corporate salvation.

“When a loving mother suffers a miscarriage, it would be cruel to fault a mother for the loss. Instead, we honor her grief and suffer with her. In the same way, when we suffer wounds, we can understand the nurture and comfort of God, who is the source of all life. Through this shift, we move from understanding salvation as an individual act of submitting to the Father to realizing that we work alongside God for the salvation of all creation… God saves us not in a solitary act of murmured a prayer but through pulsing, vibrant community. It is not because of our individual striving or saying some magic words. The act of salvation begins and ends with God, and we can participate in it if we wish, for God is pregnant with us and all of creation.”

Merritt continues: “If I were to be born of God, then God had to be mother… A good mom. She was a mother who would love her children, no matter what that child might do and no matter what her child might believe. God would mourn with loss and rejoice with pleasure.”

With these ideas of religion and God, Merritt explains “God didn’t withhold favor based on a particular belief system… God was not over me, judging me, waiting for my missteps. God was under me, grounding me. My faith didn’t have to be a constant struggle to win God’s approval because God was for me.”

For those struggling with past hurts due to religion, or faith stream; for those hungry for a deeper spiritual understanding and connection with God, I highly recommend Carol Howard Merritt’s Healing Spiritual Wounds.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!

Pinocchio: Art Credit, Disney If ever there were a time for a national "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire" award, it's now. And certai...