Jee Hyun Kim, is an
Australian behavioral neuroscientist whose work focuses on emotional learning
and memory during childhood and adolescence. She is an Associate Professor at the Florey Institute
of Neuroscience and Mental Health in Melbourne, Australia.
Kim is an active science communicator, and has given public lectures at TEDx Melbourne, Australian
Museum, National Portrait Gallery, Victorian Science Week, City of
Melbourne (Melbourne Conversations, and
the Wheeler Center.
She has also interviewed for ABC Radio, Radio New Zealand, SBS TV, Channel 10
(The Project).
You’re a neuroscientist specializing in the effects of
childhood trauma. Why does this subject interest you?
I always found
people’s different personalities and experiences fascinating. Life is a library
and each person is a book I can learn from, even if the knowledge may not have
any practical implications. I am quite curious about everything, I find
understanding for the sake of understanding very satisfying, and the most
fascinating subject for me is the human. So getting to know people by talking
and listening to them has naturally made me realise that much of who we are
come from our memories from childhood and adolescence. Also, I realised that
many of us had some traumatic experience while growing up but for some it is merely
an acknowledged event while for others it is very much present and haunting
them day to day. This fascinates me, and I thought that if we can understand
why early life experiences are so important and why some are more vulnerable or
resilient, we can help many unhappy people. Then it saddened me to find out
that almost no resources and efforts were placed into answering those questions
that are so relevant to so many people I meet. This motivates me to devote my
life to study early life memories. It should be noted that I directly study
mostly rodents, and sometimes humans.
Have you found that there are significant differences
between childhood and adult trauma? For instance, do children handle/cope with
trauma differently than adults?
There isn’t a
whole lot of research done on that topic in general. Some have definitely shown
a stronger link between childhood interpersonal trauma (e.g., emotional neglect
and abuse, physical neglect and abuse, sexual abuse) and later mental disorders
compared to adult trauma. However, they did not compare the childhood
interpersonal trauma with adult interpersonal trauma, so it is yet unclear
whether it’s the trauma age that is important or the nature of the trauma that
is important.
In terms of
coping, studies suggest that the lack of experience in children may lead to
stronger emotional memories to be formed. Experiences tend to be more novel for
children compared to adults. When a novel event is accompanied with strong
emotions, there is no previous similar non-emotional event to cushion the
strong emotions in children, which may lead to stronger emotional reaction and
subsequent emotional memory of the event. For example, an experienced driver
can recover from a traumatic accident readily because she/he has driven safely
so many times and therefore the driving memory is non-emotional. This is termed
‘latent inhibition’ – when previous non-emotional experience can reduce the
emotional impact of later experience.
However, children are naturally more inexperienced, so they are like a
novice driver who may have a traumatic accident, and because their only experience
of driving is traumatic, she/he can’t ever drive again.
But it is not all
bad news for children. My and others’ work actually suggest that children may
be more resilient if debriefed after a traumatic experience. In fact, childhood
memories are more malleable and how they interpret an event depend much on
their caregivers. The biggest difference between children and adults may be
that children look to caregivers to feel safe and interpret ambiguous
situations. Following trauma, if not given the right treatment or even
neglected by the caregivers, the trauma may shape their future forever. But if
given the right treatment, they are actually more robust than adults and can
recover from the trauma. This is why I advocate early treatment and counselling
for children and adolescents.
In one of your video interviews, you spoke about the
importance of having diversity among the ranks of STEM researchers? Could you
elaborate?
Diseases affect
everyone, regardless of race, gender, and age. Therefore it is ridiculous to
think that important decisions such as where the research funding is spent,
what sort of experiments we should do, how to interpret the data etc can be
made well by a group that is not diverse in its representation. For example,
there aren’t many developmental scientists like me around the world, and we
speculate that it is the disproportionately small amount of funding we have
access to that discourages many people not to enter or stay in developmental
research. Perhaps the disproportionately small amount of funding is due to the
fact that the decision makers tend to be ageing people with family and friends
suffering from dementia, stroke, cardiovascular disease etc. Therefore, they
bring those personal experiences to the table and as a consequence our youths
become neglected. I do not blame that people make decisions based on emotion –
I do, too. We are not logical when it comes to decision-making, and passionate,
emotional arguments can win the day. But if we can have diverse people making
decisions and problem solving together, then we can represent, understand, and
address the needs of the people better.
I have an anecdote – I was on of the board for a new psychology college to train clinical psychologists. I was the only woman, only non-white ethnicity, and only one under 50 years of age out of 6 people on the board. We were reviewing one of the construction plans for our main building and I noticed that the women’s toilet was slightly smaller than men’s and argued the reverse needs to happen because in Australia most of clinical psychology students are female (during my own Honours degree, there were 3 males out of 65 total students). None of the others had my own experience as a Psychology student to even notice, and did not actually know first-hand what would address the needs of students the best. My anecdote reflects a relatively benign situation, but imagine the devastating impact on people if important decisions on health and science policies are made by a homogeneous group. It will take far longer to solve problems because the represented problems likely not to reflect reality.
I have an anecdote – I was on of the board for a new psychology college to train clinical psychologists. I was the only woman, only non-white ethnicity, and only one under 50 years of age out of 6 people on the board. We were reviewing one of the construction plans for our main building and I noticed that the women’s toilet was slightly smaller than men’s and argued the reverse needs to happen because in Australia most of clinical psychology students are female (during my own Honours degree, there were 3 males out of 65 total students). None of the others had my own experience as a Psychology student to even notice, and did not actually know first-hand what would address the needs of students the best. My anecdote reflects a relatively benign situation, but imagine the devastating impact on people if important decisions on health and science policies are made by a homogeneous group. It will take far longer to solve problems because the represented problems likely not to reflect reality.
Given your background, I’m curious if you see any
connection between childhood trauma and the series of mass school shootings in
the US?
Not really. Australia
and the US have extremely similar prevalence of anxiety, substance use, and
mood disorders in children and adults. However, we haven’t had any mass
shootings since 1996. Not just for schools, but nowhere. I won’t say that
childhood trauma plays ‘zero’ role. Relative to gun control, however, it plays
a negligible role.
What do you see as possible solutions to avoid such
shootings from happening in the future?
Ban automatic and
semi automatic guns completely. Studies have shown over and over again the
availability of automated guns is the greatest factor to mass shootings.
As an Australian resident and as a neuroscientist do
you wonder if there could be a cultural explanation for the number of school
shootings in the US?
Having lived in
both countries, I find that Australia and US are surprisingly similar in
culture. Both countries value individualism, independence, honesty and hard
work. But our government policies are very different on many things, and I
really do think it is the gun laws that separate us in terms of the number of
school shootings.
Following a mass shooting episode in 1996 in Tasmania,
the Australian government quickly came together to formulate an effective
response. The government banned automatic and
semiautomatic firearms, adopted new licensing requirements, established a
national firearms registry, and instituted a 28-day waiting period for gun
purchases. It also bought and destroyed more than 600,000 civilian-owned
firearms. As a resident of Australia, what can you tell us about the
effectiveness of this approach?
Super effective. Despite
the similarities in our culture, every year the US has 10 times more
gun-related deaths per capita than Australia. For every 100,000 people,
Australia only has 1, and the US has more than 10.
I personally have
friends who enjoy hunting and own rifles (non-automatic guns). They all need to
be locked up but they can choose where they are locked up. So people do have
freedom to own guns, just not the automatics that easily lead to killing.
In your opinion/experience, why is it harder for women
to succeed in STEM careers?
Time and again
studies have shown that there are subconscious biases against women. These
subconscious biases downgrade women’s abilities and discredit their success.
Subconscious biases are difficult to combat because they are subconscious.
However, we can consciously put in rules to be more aware of the biases by
openly discussing the biases and then presenting facts showing how there is not
a single academic measure in children and adolescents that show sex differences.
There is also a
cultural definition of what is feminine or masculine that is neither logical nor
representative of reality. I have been told (by both males and females) that I
am too assertive or too confident or too loud and I wonder whether if I was a
male or not Asian, whether my assertion, confidence or volume would be so
offensive. So in a way I am ‘punished’ for being who I am, which discourages me
from being assertive, confident, or loud (of course I consciously fight against
this and try my best to be myself). Conversely, then I wonder when a female is
passive or modest they are more rewarded for that behaviour, which encourages
the female to continue being passive or modest. Further, so many of us
scientist women have experienced unsolicited advice on our specialisation from
other males who have no expertise on the subject. This happens to me all the
time. Even for public speaking, I have so many random men without any
experience in public speaking telling me how to do better next time. And I’ve
won so many prizes on public speaking! Of course this does not mean I can’t
learn from others, so I always listen. But it is intriguing that women don’t
give me unsolicited advice but men do. So I wonder whether men have been
rewarded with saying random advice in the past, so they are encouraged to
repeat this behaviour. And whether they have been punished for being quiet or
humble, so they are discouraged to be quiet or humble.
Lastly, there is lack
of mentoring for women. Again, this is because leadership groups typically
involve males rather than females, so looking after and mentoring women can go
neglected. I actually believe in the ‘quota’ system – demand a certain level of
representation in leadership. Then people will be more exposed to the benefits
of diversity, which will lead to mentoring of more junior culturally diverse
people, which will lead to even more representation of diversity in leadership
in future.
In another video interview, you talked about the
importance of your faith. Could you talk about your own faith journey?
I am nothing
without Jesus. Seriously. My mum was physically and emotionally abused by my
dad’s family as soon as she was married. So my mum was already depressed and
anxious when I was born. Also my dad worked long hours, so she was often alone.
I was the only living thing around that did not abuse her, so I think for her
the only outlet was to abuse me. I was hit weekly if not daily. I remember mum
complaining when I was six about how all the long household objects (vacuum
cleaner shaft, broomstick, shoe horn etc.) were broken because I made her hit
me. So I was a super quiet scared child. I found it difficult to make friends.
I was shy and anxious. I worried all the time, I don't really remember about
what. I cut myself, and thought about killing myself a lot because I could not
see how life was worth living because if my own mum doesn’t love me, who could
possibly love me (I no longer think my mum hates me and know that she loves me
very much, but I used to think differently).
Then we moved to
Sydney for my dad’s work. Because we were away from his family, mum was less
stressed and treated me much better, although she relapsed every now and then
when she was stressed or when she and dad fought. But the real turning point
was meeting Jesus for me when I was 16. It is the first time to experience
unconditional acceptance and love. To have someone so perfect love me exposes
my own sin and selfishness, but that makes his love and grace so much greater,
because he still loves me despite my selfishness and mistakes. This gave me
strength to worry less about punishment and what others think of me, which gave
me the courage to be more myself. To be more comfortable with my own desires,
emotions, and failures. I always knew I was a born extrovert – I love sharing
my thoughts and feelings, making decisions together, and listening to other
people. Before Jesus I felt too scared to share, but to know and be loved by
God gave me the strength to be myself. To my surprise, it turned out that the
less I care about what people think of me, the more I was genuine and
authentic, and the more people loved me anyways, although that was not my
motivation. The bible told me that being genuine makes God happy and in return
for His love, I wanted to be more genuine. More myself. Solomon also said in
the bible that nothing is new and history repeats itself and everything is
meaningless but because how we live in this life determines our eternity, we
need to follow our heart. So having Jesus as my Lord and Saviour reminds me to
follow my heart. Not what others say, not what my sinful nature tells me to do
to impress others or to save myself and be cowardly and selfish, but what my
heart really says. What my spirit that God designed tells me to feel, think,
and do. So I am a slave to Christ but I truly feel free to be myself in his
love.
My work actually
suggests that the wrong beliefs I held in childhood cannot be erased because
the counter-belief came too late as a teenager. It’s true. Relapse is a part of
adult life. When I am tired or hurting, I do relapse into thinking that no one
loves me and that my life is not worth living. But from my work, I also know
that I am not the only one who feels this way. If feeling this way is the norm,
then surely it is not a failure to relapse but rather every day when I don’t
relapse shows success. So I choose not to give up. I choose to sleep and wake
up and re assess how I feel. I always feel better the next day.
Has your faith had any influence in your research
career?
Daily. Daniel had
a spirit of excellence because he served God. So I try to do my job
excellently. Do not get me wrong, there are plenty of non-Christians who are
very excellent in their job and are more selfless than I am, so that is not
what I think makes me a Christian at work. However, I do think that there are
things that may distinguish me as a Christian time to time, and I think that is
the fruit of the Holy Spirit. Love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness,
faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. We all start from different places
in these qualities, some are born better some are born worse. But when family
and friends observe that I am getting better, progressing, I think it is
evidence that Jesus lives within me. Of course I fail, but thankfully in
Christianity we are not expected to be perfect. But we are expected to try
again and not give up and run this race until we see Jesus face to face. I
can’t wait. Hopefully he will tell me ‘well done good and faithful servant’.
This motivates me to keep going even when I’m hurting and tired, even when I’ve
been used and disappointed.
Is there anything else you’d like to mention?
None of my work
achievements are actually mine. I always say ‘the universe’ or ‘luck’ but I do mean
God. I don’t say ‘blessed’ though, sometimes ‘blessed’ sounds like God chose
you because you were good or something. God chooses what He chooses, I am sure
it’s not our works, and we cannot comprehend in our limited brain His wisdom
and also His justice. This also means that none of my work failures are mine.
Jesus carries me in the vision he has placed in my heart. So I am not afraid of
the future. I am not afraid because I cannot own the failures, just as I cannot
own the successes. But I live as a child of God responding to His love by
trying to be more like Jesus. This gives me freedom. I hope as many people as
possible to experience this freedom.
To watch Dr. Jee Huyn Kim's TED Talk, click here.
-----
Photo Credits: TEDEx, Florey Institute, Research Gate.
-----
Photo Credits: TEDEx, Florey Institute, Research Gate.
Your work on emotional learning and memory is truly remarkable, and your commitment to science communication is inspiring. As someone interested in Melbourne children's psychology, I find your research incredibly relevant. It's refreshing to see a scientist who not only excels in academia but also engages with the community through TEDx talks and public lectures.
ReplyDelete